- Model:
- R92
Reviews
-
92 Pic Rail
This was a surprisingly good deal, and works quite well. It's well-designed, installed easily, and works great.
-
Rail with peep sight
Don’t hesitate to buy this! It’s fantastic! I had trouble using the original iron sights on my R92 but after I installed the peep sight I’m dead on at 100yrs and could probably go beyond that if I had the range to. Makes it even better knowing I could install a scope or red dot if I wanted.
-
Great for a red dot
I bought this for my R92 so I could have the option to pop off the red dot if needed due to mechanical failure, etc. The peep sight isn't really compatible with the stock front sight. Shoots way to high even with the peep sight maxed out. It's better than nothing. I may try a different front sight but for now works just fine with my red dot. I'd still recommend it.
-
best upgrade
Should have done this long ago. works well. I'm glad it's available again.
-
Pic rail with peep sight
High quality tight tolerances great fitment
-
Installed on both my R92’s. 454 Casull and 357 Mag. Sighted in the 454. Only drawback is cannot lower the peep/ ghost ring sight anymore. I need a taller front sight to lower the point of impact. At 50 yards holding at the 6 o’clock position the roun
Definitely recommend A cantilever scope mount is required to mount optics too much eye relief without it
-
Rossi R92 Picatinny Rail w/ Peep Sight & Screws
Looks heat on gun but not fully installed yet because #1 wrong size Allen wrench that came with it ##2 only 1 of 3 screw was I was able to tighten all the way and 3 screw partial tighten before they stripped, I will have to get local gunsmith to finish it up with proper tools… other than that product is good quality would of been 5 stars if I didn’t have these issues. And fast shipping , thank you.
-
R92 picatenny rail with peep
Perfect fit on my new R92 38/357. Easy to install and added a leupold 2x7 freedom scope. Great setup and very strong mount to hold dead on accurate alignment.
-
Pic rail
Exactly what I wanted. It might have been nice to have instructions with torque specs though.